The uxerhub alternative to Testlify, for product roles
By Sergio Gualda · 6 min read · Updated
Testlify's site puts its library at 3,500+ validated tests covering 5,000+ roles in 9+ languages, with 25+ question formats including situational judgment tests. uxerhub covers six product roles and one question: who fits your team. The two products make different strategic bets. A library gives you a test for whatever you're hiring; uxerhub gives you a result that changes depending on which capabilities you said this job can't do without.
What Testlify does better
Coverage, at a scale we'll never approach. 3,500+ tests across 5,000+ roles means that whatever opens next quarter (a controller, a warehouse supervisor, a Spanish-speaking support lead) has something ready. For a small talent team, that's the entire value proposition.
It also runs in 9+ languages, which matters immediately if you hire outside English-speaking markets. uxerhub is English-only today.
And it's fast to set up and cheap to try, with a free trial that doesn't ask for a card. Time-to-first-assessment is a real feature, and theirs is better than most.
Side by side
Everything in the Testlify column comes from their own public site. Where they don’t publish something, the table says so instead of guessing.
| Testlify | uxerhub | |
|---|---|---|
| Library | 3,500+ tests, 5,000+ roles, 25+ question formats, 9+ languages | One instrument, six roles, one language |
| Situational judgment | Available as one format among many in the library | The whole instrument, built for six roles and read against the role you describe |
| How a role is targeted | You pick the tests that match the job title | You describe the job and what it can't do without; the report follows |
| What the report ends in | A score, per test, per candidate | A recommendation about the role: whether to interview, and what to ask if you do |
| Time on the candidate | About half an hour for a screening assessment, per their site | About 15 minutes, and only ever once |
| Pricing shape | Free trial, then subscription tiers | First candidate free, then credit packs that never expire. No subscription. |
Which one you should pick
Choose Testlify if
- You hire for many different roles and can't predict which are next.
- You need languages other than English.
- You want one vendor, one invoice and one login for the whole company.
- Volume screening is the problem you're solving.
Choose uxerhub if
- Product roles are most of what you hire, and the decisions are expensive.
- You want the instrument to know the difference between two jobs with the same title.
- You want to know who fits your team, not a percentile.
- You'd rather run one thing properly than assemble five tests per role.
Testlify has situational judgment tests. So what's different?
It's the fairest question on the page, and it deserves a precise answer.
A library SJT is written to be broadly applicable, which is what earns it a place in a library of 3,500. It scores the same way for every buyer because it has to: it can't know what your job needs.
Ours makes the opposite trade. The twelve situations are written for six roles and nothing else, and before a candidate sees them you name the capabilities the role can't do without. The report is read against them. The consequence is concrete: the same candidate, with the same answers, comes out as a clear yes for one job and a clear no for another, because the two jobs need different things and now the result says so.
That advantage only holds when the thing you're deciding is one particular role.
The cost of going narrow, stated plainly
Six roles means that if your next opening is anything else, we're useless to you. No fallback, no adjacent test. That's a cost, and it falls on you rather than on us.
What it buys is depth a library can't fund per role. Every situation is written and rewritten against how these six jobs go wrong, there's no correct answer to game, and the report can be read against your role because we know what these roles do.
Frequently asked
- Is uxerhub cheaper than Testlify?
- Different shape, so it depends on volume. uxerhub has no subscription: the first candidate is free, then packs at $89 for 5, $290 for 20 and $690 for 60, and credits never expire. If you assess a handful of product candidates a quarter, that's far less than a seat-based subscription. If you assess hundreds of people across a company, a subscription library will be cheaper per head.
- Does uxerhub support other languages?
- Not yet. It's English only. The site is built for it (the routing and content layer already handle locales), but no other language is live, and we won't list languages we haven't validated the instrument in.
- Can uxerhub screen high volumes?
- It can, but it's built for a later point: you have six plausible people and have to pick three to interview, the decision that's expensive to get wrong. Cutting three hundred applications to thirty is a different job, and a library does it better.