Place product people on client work with less guesswork
Agencies and studios bring in product people repeatedly, designers, PMs and researchers, and absorb the cost of a bad fit themselves, in rework, margin and client trust. Assessing a freelancer before they're placed on a client project turns an intuition-based decision into a documented one, and gives you something to show the client.

What usually happens
You get it wrong two or three times a year. The work still gets delivered, but the senior you brought in turns out to need direction on every decision, and someone on your team ends up doing the thinking they were paid for.
You absorb that, and the client never sees it. It comes out of margin, out of your project lead's week, and occasionally out of a relationship you spent two years building.
2–3×
Times a year a typical studio places a designer who needs more direction than their rate implies. The cost lands on your margin.
The objection we hear
“We hire on portfolio and a call. It mostly works.”
It mostly works, and the times it doesn't are expensive and invisible in advance. The question is whether $89 is a reasonable hedge on a €30,000 engagement.
There's a second reason, and for agencies it's often the bigger one: a fit report is something you can put in front of a client. “We assess every designer we place” is a differentiator your competitors can't claim.
How it fits your process
01 / 03
Build a bench instead of a shortlist
Assess freelancers once and keep the report. A result stays valid for six months, so the same person doesn’t repeat it for your next project.
02 / 03
Something to show the client
The report reads as part of your process: a documented reason behind each person you place, rather than a hunch.
03 / 03
One link, pasted in your brief
Put a process link in the freelancer call-out you already post. Everyone who applies gets assessed, and the completed ones appear in your dashboard without any coordination on your side.
Roles you probably hire
Product Designer
The CEO: “We need a guided onboarding with tooltips. I saw it at a competitor and it works.”
UX Researcher
The Head of Product: “Run some user interviews and tell us whether people want this feature.”
Frontend Engineer
The Tech Lead: “Design handed over the new dashboard. It ships in two weeks.”
Questions from agencies & studios
Yes. It’s written to be read by someone outside the craft, so you can forward it as it is.
Some will, and that tells you something too. Most accept it once they see it's fifteen minutes on a fictional company, with nothing to prepare, and that they won't be asked to repeat it for the next company.
They're assessed once. The report is attached to the person rather than the placement, and it stays valid for six months.
Read these before you decide
11 min read
How to choose a hiring assessment tool
The choice is decided by two numbers before any feature list matters: how many different roles you hire for, and what a wrong hire costs you. Wide and cheap points to a test library; narrow and expensive points to a purpose-built instrument. Everything vendors compete on (question formats, integrations, dashboards) only starts to matter once those two numbers have eliminated most of the market.
Read it8 min read
How to evaluate a UX researcher
Evaluate a UX researcher on what they refuse to conclude: whether they reframe a question that can't be answered, whether the method follows the decision rather than the budget, how they spot a flawed study and say so, and how they deliver a finding nobody wants. A portfolio shows conclusions that survived. It never shows the studies that shouldn't have been run.
Read it8 min read
How to evaluate a frontend engineer beyond the coding test
A coding test answers whether someone can build it. It doesn't answer whether they should have. That comes down to whether they spot the states a design forgot, how they respond to a spec that breaks at scale, what they cut when the date moves, and whether they name the risk they're shipping with. Those decisions make a frontend hire expensive or excellent, and none of them appear in an algorithm exercise.
Read it
You have a role open right now
Request access and your first candidate is on us. Setting up the role takes about ninety seconds.