Skip to content
uxerhub
Request access

Hiring your first designer without a design leader

When you're hiring your first product designer, finding candidates is the easy part. The hard part is that nobody at the company can tell a strong one from a well-presented one. A structured assessment gives you an outside reference: the same twelve situations for everyone, scored against the capabilities you said this role needs, and a recommendation you can read without being a designer.

Request access to the beta

No card or call needed, and the report is ready the second they finish.

What usually happens

You have five candidates. All five portfolios look good, because portfolios are made to look good and because the people who make them are designers. You have no internal benchmark and no design lead to ask, so you can't tell whether you're looking at senior work or a competent presentation of junior work.

So you fall back on the interview, and the interview rewards whoever is most comfortable talking about their work. That correlation with judgment is weaker than most founders assume, and it's weakest where the stakes are highest: at senior level, where the calmest presenter is often the one who has been shielded from the hard decisions.

$40,000

What a wrong first design hire costs a seed-stage company, before counting the four months of product direction that went with it.

The objection we hear

“I'm not a designer. How would I even read the result?”

That's the reader the report is written for. It opens with a recommendation in plain language, without design vocabulary.

You don't need to know what information architecture is to see the difference between someone who says “we should improve the onboarding experience” and someone who says “88% set up their venue without help; they aren’t lost, they’re tired”. One of those is thinking. You can tell which.

How it fits your process

01 / 03

After the first call, before the final round

Send it once you have three to five people you'd seriously consider. Running it earlier wastes candidates' time; running it later means you've already formed an opinion the report has to fight.

02 / 03

It gives you questions as well as a ranking

The most useful output for a founder is the “main risk” line. It tells you what to press on in the final conversation, which is the part you're good at.

03 / 03

It works for a contractor too

The same case works whether you're hiring permanently or bringing someone in for three months. The failure mode is identical: paying for six weeks before discovering the fit is wrong.

Roles you probably hire

All six roles we assess

Questions

Questions from startups

That's the strongest case for it. A team that hires ten designers a year develops a feel for it and can afford a mistake. Hiring one means you get a single attempt with no calibration, and that person defines your product for the next two years.

Not with this format. Seniors object to unpaid weekend assignments. Fifteen minutes on a fictional company, with nothing to prepare, is a different request. And they only sit it once: if another company asks for the same assessment, they don't repeat it.

Yes, and it's arguably the best fit. A founding designer is hired for judgment under total ambiguity, which is exactly what the case puts them in.

Further reading

Also for

Related reading

Read these before you decide