Skip to content

Placing product roles you cannot assess yourself

Recruiters placing product and design roles are paid for judgment they usually cannot exercise: almost nobody in recruitment can assess design or product craft. An assessment attached to your shortlist turns “here are five CVs” into “here are three people, scored, with the evidence” — which is the difference your fee is supposed to buy.

Request access to the beta

No card. No call. The report exists the second they finish.

What usually happens

Your client's hiring manager can evaluate the work. You cannot, and both of you know it. So your shortlist is built on CV pattern-matching, company names and a conversation — and when a placement fails at month three, the credit you lose is disproportionate to the reason.

Meanwhile every other recruiter approaching that client is sending the same profiles from the same LinkedIn searches.

15–25%

Of first-year salary, the standard contingency fee — for a shortlist built without any assessment of the craft being hired for.

The objection we hear

“Adding a step will lose me candidates.”

It will lose you some, and it is worth knowing which. The format is designed against exactly this: 75 timed minutes, a fictional product, criteria published in advance, and they only ever sit it once — not once per company.

The candidates who complete it also become more placeable. A scored report attached to a profile is a reason for a hiring manager to take your call over the next recruiter's.

How it fits your process

Assess before you submit, not after

A shortlist that arrives with evidence changes the conversation with the hiring manager. You stop defending a CV and start discussing a result.

It compounds across searches

Someone you assess for one client is already assessed for the next. The report belongs to the candidate and travels with them, so your network becomes progressively more valuable to place.

Charge it through, or absorb it

At $89 against a fee of several thousand, most recruiters absorb it and use it as a differentiator. Some itemise it. Either works.

Questions from recruiters

Yes. That is the point of it. On the agency plan it carries your brand.

Yes, always. Assessing someone without telling them who is looking would be indefensible, and they consent before starting.

Then check what it measures. Most general libraries score knowledge with multiple choice, which answers a different question from this one. If they measure judgment already, you do not need us.

You have an open role right now.

Invite one candidate and read their report the moment they finish.